|
Abstract
Abstract for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy
Abstract
Aims Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown in several
clinical trials to improve symptoms and exercise capacity in patients
with advanced heart failure. The first clinical trials of CRT-D devices
were based on populations who already met a standard indication for
implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. In these patients,
when CRT is contemplated, a CRT-D device is used. In a broad population
of patients with advanced heart failure, the choice of adding ICD
therapy is less clear.
Methods and results Results of several clinical trials of CRT and ICD
use in heart failure are reviewed. An analysis of data suggests that CRT
may reduce death due to progressive heart failure. Recently, the
COMPANION trial has reported that CRT can reduce long-term morbidity and
mortality. CRT can be delivered as a pacemaker only, or in combination
with an ICD. Taken alone, an ICD can improve survival in select groups
of patients with left ventricular dysfunction; however, adverse effects
have been seen, such as worsening heart failure.
Conclusion There are no clinical trials designed specifically to address
the relative merits of CRT delivered by pacemaker versus ICD. Based on
our knowledge of the effects of both, along with data from recent
clinical trials, it appears as though the preponderance of evidence is
in favor of CRT-D. More will be learned from clinical trials currently
underway
Key Words: Heart failure • Implantable cardioverter defibrillator •
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
An ICD is an electrical device that is implanted in the chest to monitor
and record, and if necessary, correct episodes of arrhythmias.
An ICD consists of two parts:
*
A pulse generator - a relatively small device (about 40cubic cm,
weighing about 100g) that is implanted under the muscle or skin below
the left collarbone. This generator consists of a lithium battery,
energy delivery components and electrical circuitry all sealed in a
case.
*
One or more thin, coated wire electrodes that connect to the pulse
generator to your heart. The wire electrode(s) travel through the vein
between the implant site and the heart.
The electrode(s) in the heart monitor the heart rhythm. If an arrhythmia
is detected, the generator activates the appropriate treatment to
eliminate the arrhythmia, as programmed by your cardiologist.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. - June 22, 2006 - Saint Thomas Hospital today announced
the launch of a landmark clinical trial for a new heart-failure device
that combines the capabilities of an implantable cardioverter
defibrillator (ICD) with a new technology that continuously records
pressure inside the heart, and can alert physicians to potential
heart-failure complications before they worsen.
The investigational device, known as the Chronicle® ICD, features both
the traditional ICD’s ability to restore normal heart rhythm following a
dangerously fast heartbeat and the first-ever real-time tracking of
pressure inside the heart, body temperature, patient activity and heart
rate 24 hours a day. Patients implanted with a Chronicle ICD will
transmit that information from home, using a standard phone line, to
their physicians who view the recorded data from a secure Web site in
their office and then potentially make changes to patients’ medications
or diet.
“Chronicle ICD represents a fundamental change in the way heart-device
makers and cardiologists will address chronic diseases such as heart
failure in the years to come,” said the clinical trial’s principal
investigator, Dr. Mark Aaron, Saint Thomas Hospital. “It’s no longer
enough to wait until patients develop symptoms of worsening
heart-failure - patients and physicians need technology, like Chronicle
ICD, that has the potential to provide an early and accurate indication
of deterioration in heart failure status, thereby allowing clinicians to
take appropriate preventive measures.”
The study seeks to determine the safety, efficacy and functionality of
the Chronicle ICD when used in heart-failure patients indicated for ICD
therapy. Sponsored by Medtronic, the blinded study is a prospective,
randomized, multi-center clinical trial at up to 75 sites in the United
States involving approximately 850 patients with mild to moderate heart
failure (NYHA Class II and III).
Heart failure is a condition in which the heart pumps blood
inadequately, leading to reduced blood flow and possible back up of
blood in the veins and lungs. Heart failure can lead to sudden cardiac
arrest.
Saint Thomas Hospital is a member of Saint Thomas Health Services, a
faith-based ministry with 7,500 associates serving Middle Tennessee at
Saint Thomas and Baptist Hospitals in Nashville, Middle Tennessee
Medical Center in Murfreesboro and Hickman Community Hospital in
Centerville.
St. Paul, MN, March 9, 2004 — St. Jude Medical, Inc. (NYSE: STJ)
announced today that data from its RHYTHM (Resynchronization HemodYnamic
Treatment for Heart Failure Management) ICD clinical trial showed a
statistically significant improvement in peak VO2 and exercise duration
for patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). All
prospectively defined primary safety and efficacy endpoints of the study
were successfully met. The announcement was made today in conjunction
with the American College of Cardiology’s 2004 Scientific Session in New
Orleans, Louisiana.
“The Epic™ HF ICD evaluated in this study effectively combines pacemaker
therapy, defibrillation therapy and left-heart stimulation to treat the
complexities of heart failure,” said Kyong T. Turk, M.D., of the
Nebraska Heart Institute, Lincoln, Nebraska, who enrolled the most
patients in the RHYTHM clinical study. “These multiple sophisticated
therapies in one compact, easy to implant device give me significant
flexibility to optimize patient care.”
The primary efficacy endpoint of the RHYTHM ICD study was improvement in
cardiac function as measured by patient peak VO2 during cardiopulmonary
exercise testing. The clinical trial was sized based on an expectation
that the CRT arm of the study would show a 1.6 ml/kg/min improvement in
peak VO2 compared with the control group, which did not have the CRT
feature activated. The actual observed improvement level for CRT
compared to control was 1.93 ml/kg/min, which was statistically
significant (p=0.001). Secondary endpoints concerning NYHA class and
Quality of Life were also statistically significantly improved with CRT
(p=0.048 and p=0.009, respectively), with the six minute walk test
demonstrating a strong trend toward significance (p=0.07). The study
evaluated resynchronization effectiveness, defibrillation system
efficacy, defibrillation system safety and left ventricle lead
performance.
“This is a significant prospective, randomized study, which adds to the
growing body of evidence supporting the therapeutic effectiveness of
cardiac resynchronization therapy as an adjunct to optimal medical
therapy for heart failure patients,” added Eric S. Fain, M.D., Senior
Vice President, Development and Clinical/Regulatory Affairs for St. Jude
Medical’s Cardiac Rhythm Management business. “The RHYTHM study has a
rigorous protocol with more stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria than
previous studies, so all of the participating RHYTHM ICD investigators
should be congratulated on achieving this important milestone.”
Patients enrolled in the RHYTHM ICD study have an approved indication
for an ICD; symptomatic, advanced heart failure (NYHA Class III/IV) not
due to reversible causes, for at least six months, despite receiving
optimal pharmacological therapy for a minimum of 90 days; an ejection
fraction of = 35% (volume of blood pumped compared to volume filled),
and a prolonged QRS duration (ventricular activity shown in an
electrocardiogram).
The RHYTHM study evaluated the St. Jude Medical Epic™ HF model V-338
implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), which is used to treat
heart failure patients who are also at risk of dangerously fast heart
rhythms (ventricular tachyarrhythmias). The Epic™ HF ICD offers negative
AV/PV hysteresis with search capability designed to ensure a high
percentage of biventricular pacing. It’s the world’s smallest
high-voltage cardiac resynchronization device, designed to make
implantation easier while improving patient comfort and cosmetic
appearance. The device delivers 30 joules of energy in a
physiologic-shaped 36-cc ICD.
The device was paired with either the Aescula™ model 1055K or QuickSite™
model 1056K left heart lead. During the separate QuickSite phase of the
RHYTHM ICD Study, the implant success rate of the QuickSite lead was
94.4%. All prospectively defined endpoints of the QuickSite phase of the
study were met.
Data from the RHYTHM study is the basis for submission to the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval of the devices used in the
study. St. Jude Medical reaffirms its previous guidance that it expects
FDA approval of the studied devices by the May 2004 NASPE/Heart Rhythm
Society meeting.
Heart failure is one of the most widespread cardiac afflictions,
affecting approximately five million people in the United States. About
550,000 new patients are diagnosed with heart failure each year. The
majority die within five years of diagnosis.
ICD means Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator. Another name is AICD,
for Automatic ICD. ICDs are miniature, internal versions of those shock
paddles paramedics use to zap people back to life after a cardiac
arrest.
The device is really a small electric generator hooked up to wires
called leads. The generator is made of electronic circuits plus a
battery sealed into one unit. A typical ICD weighs about 4 ounces, and
measures about 1/2 inch thick by 2 inches wide.
The lead (or leads) are the wires that connect the ICD to your heart.
They are flexible insulated wires with an electrode tip. The tip is
placed against the heart wall and carries electrical impulses from the
ICD to the heart. It also sends information from your heart back to the
ICD for storage as data, like files on the hard drive in your computer.
An ICD lead has a shocking coil (some leads have 2 coils) on its tip to
deliver large amounts of energy to the heart. Wire coils make up the
inside of the lead.
ICD diagramThe Implant - This procedure generally takes about 2 hours.
During this procedure, you’ll be sedated with an IV drug, but you’ll be
breathing on your own, unlike open heart surgery - which this is not.
You will be pretty much out of it, but not asleep. A local anesthetic
will also be given so your skin being cut doesn’t hurt you.
A cut is made under your collarbone, and the ICD is implanted under your
skin in the upper chest (sometimes in the abdomen). A vein near your
collarbone is cut during the procedure so the lead (or leads) can be
guided through the cut vein into your heart’s chambers, beginning with
the right ventricle. The tip of the lead touches your heart’s inner
wall.
You may need another lead positioned in the upper right chamber of your
heart. Where the leads go depends on your individual needs. You might
need a lead placed just under the skin next to your rib cage. This would
be placed through a small cut in your left side. Sometimes a lead is
placed on the outside of your heart.
After the leads are in place, they’re tested to make sure they read your
heart beat properly. Then the leads are stitched to nearby tissue so
they stay put. Finally, the leads’ ends are hooked up to the generator.
Your doctor will deliberately make your heart go into a funky rhythm.
That’s so he can test your ICD and make sure it will shock your heart
back into normal rhythm on its own.
For a short time after the implant, the electrode at the end of the lead
will actually “grow into” the wall of the ventricle - this won’t
interfere with heart function. You won’t sense any of this because the
inside wall of the heart is not sensitive to pain.
Batteries - Most ICDs now have a battery life of 5 to 7 years. The
battery will be checked now and then at your doctor’s office. The ICD
has an internal beeper that will alert you if the battery gets too low.
When the battery wears down, the whole ICD generator unit has to be
replaced. This is done like the original procedure but since leads
usually do not have to be replaced, it’s quicker and easier.
How It Works - An ICD monitors your heart all the time but only shocks
you if it’s software spots a rhythm problem. When it detects an
incorrect heart rhythm, it can do one of 3 things:
1. implanted ICDPace your heart like a pacemaker for a short period of
time. You may not even feel this. The ICD’s software calculates the
speed of a tachycardia by averaging 4 or 5 heart beats from just before
the arrhythmia - your ICD is always on the job. Then it uses a
percentage of that average heart rate to pace your heart. It paces your
heart at a faster than usual rate. This is called “overdrive” pacing.
Why pace your heart at a fast rate instead of just knocking it all the
way back to normal? Well, the ICD is trying to control your heart rhythm
to prevent your fast heart rate from turning into fibrillation, which is
very dangerous. Trying to slow your heart down all the way quickly
probably wouldn’t work.
If your ICD can temporarily pace your heart at a fast rate - but at a
constant speed and in a steady rhythm - it may be able to avoid zapping
you, by letting your heart get control of its own rhythm again. Letting
your heart rate just keep getting faster and faster could result in
fibrillation - and a zap!
2. Cardiovert your heart. This is a relatively low energy shock to
persuade your heart to get back into proper rhythm. How will this feel
to you? Unfortunately, it might as well be an out and out zap. Studies
show that all shocks using more than 1.5 joules of “juice” feel the same
to you - the person getting the shock. So, what makes a “cardioversion”
different from a “defibrillation?”
Let’s say your ICD detected tachycardia and tried to pace your heart
like I described above, but it didn’t work. Your ICD now tries to
“cardiovert” your heart to normal rhythm and rate. What’s the
difference? The ICD gets ready to shock you but it waits for a certain
point in your heart rhythm.
If the ICD can time its shock just right, it will successfully put you
back into normal rhythm. Cardioversion success depends on the timing of
when the ICD delivers a shock. If it shocked you at the wrong spot
(time) in your heart rhythm, it could actually send you into
fibrillation. Its programming prevents that.
3. Defibrillate your heart. This is the zap, a high energy shock to stop
your heart. The “cardioversion” jolts your heart back into normal rhythm
when it is beating too fast. A “defib” out and out stops your heart when
your heart rhythm is erratic (irregular) enough to be dangerous. This
gives your heart’s natural pacemaker time to get control of your heart’s
rhythm again. You can read more about your heart’s natural pacemaker on
my pacemaker page.
When your ICD delivers a defib (zap) it is meant to stop your heart for
a programmed amount of time, not at a certain time. Often it tries to
stop your heart for a full 1/2 second. Your ICD may use as much as 4
times more energy to zap you than it uses to cardiovert you.
The zap is a nasty thing and may even knock you down or knock you out,
but this is a life-saver!
X-ray of patient with pacer and ICDYour ICD also records your heart’s
activity just before, during, and after each episode. Your doctor can
see that information in his office or in the hospital to see why you are
getting zapped. This info also helps him fine-tune your ICD to prevent
unnecessary zaps. He uses a device called a “programmer” to communicate
with the software in your ICD. The programmer is actually a small,
powerful computer, designed for one purpose only - to maintenance ICDs.
There is usually no need to get to the ICD physically to reprogram it.
There is an antennna built into your ICD that can receive signals from
the programmer to make most software changes.
Why Do You Need An ICD? - Your heart has a natural pacemaker called the
SA node (sinoatrial node), that produces electrical signals inside your
heart. It’s in the upper right chamber (atrium) of your heart. The SA
node’s signals travel through certain pathways in the heart muscle,
causing the heart’s chambers to beat as a team. That electrical system
can get out of whack for various reasons and make your heart rhythm go
very fast, very irregular, or very slow - all bad. This is called
arrhythmia.
Certain types of arrhythmia can be dangerous. For people with a
dangerous arrhythmia that comes and goes, either anti-arrhythmic drugs
or an ICD - or both - may be needed.
Living With An ICD - If your ICD shocks you, it may just be annoying or
it may knock you unconscious. If you get a shock, call your doctor. He
may just say to wait for your next appointment or he may want to add a
med, or reprogram your ICD.
If you have more than 2 shocks close together, or feel really sick like
you get dizzy, clammy, or if you get palpitations, you should call an
ambulance to bring you to the emergency room. Always tell doctors,
surgeons, and dentists treating you that you have an ICD.
If your arrhythmia made you pass out or nearly so, you won’t be allowed
to drive for awhile after getting your ICD - for obvious reasons. You
can still use most appliances safely, including TV sets, microwave
ovens, VCRs, radios and stereo components, kitchen appliances, power
tools (unless they are magnetized), and your personal computer.
You should avoid strong electrical or magnetic fields, including
electrical power plants, ignition systems, stereo speakers, and magnetic
wands like airport security people use. You can walk through metal
detector gates but your ICD may set off the alarm; It won’t hurt you or
your ICD, though. Avoid arc welding equipment, power generators, MRI
scanners, and some medical procedures like electrocautery to stop
bleeding or the heat therapy that physical therapists use on muscles.
Obviously contact sports are out! Never put a magnet on or near your ICD
and keep cell phones 6 inches or more away from the device. That means
use your other ear!
ICD Studies
* Guidant Recalls Thousands of Defective ICDs
* Infection Rate With ICD Implant Higher Than Thought
* Device Implant Infections Rising Fast - Increases Risk of Death
* ICDs Vs Drug Treatment Vs No Treatment - The MADIT Trial
* ICDs Vs Amiodarone For Sudden Death Survivors & More
* ICDs Vs Amiodarone - AMIOVERT Trial
* Do ICDs Benefit Heart Failure Patients?
* Contak includes ICD, Dual-Pacer and Heart Booster All In One
* ICDs Safe To Go Through Store Theft Detectors
* ICDs Work Best For Low EF Patients
* Which Heart Failure Patients Really Benefit From An ICD?
* ICDs and DNR Orders - A Dilemma?
* V-Tach Induced During EPS Is A Serious Danger Sign
* ICD Wearers To Send Device Data To Doctor Over Phone Line
* Heart Attack Survivors With Low EF Increase Survival With ICD
* Medtronic Heart Failure Pacemaker With ICD Approved
* Sleep, Breathing, and ICDs
* COMPANION Trial Shows ICD/Pacemaker Benefit in Heart Failure
* ICD Zap Survivors Need Special Monitoring
A-fib Cardioverters
* Implanted Device Uses Magnetism to Stop A-fib
* Implanted Cardioverter For A-fib In Trials
WWW Links
* Zapper
* Sudden Cardiac Death Survivor’s Network - support
* Implantable dot Com
* The Bionic Man
* Zvi Har’El’s page, who has hypertrophic cardiomyopathy & an ICD
* The EP Lab
* Technical ICD info
* MT Desk list of medical device manufacturers
Guidant Recalls ICDs
June 17, 2005 - Guidant has recalled a whole boatload of defective ICDs.
See the FDA site, specifically
www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2005/NEW01185.html for more information.
That page lists the following Guidant devices as being part of this
recall, along with more information:
* PRIZM 2 DR, Model 1861, manufactured on or before April 16, 2002
* CONTAK RENEWAL, Model H135, manufactured on or before August 26, 2004
* CONTAK RENEWAL 2, Model H155, manufactured on or before August 26,
2004
The Guidant web site also lists the ICDs in this recall. See
www.guidant.com/news/500/web_release/nr_000548.shtml. Here are the ICDs
listed there:
* Ventak Prizm 2 DR (Model 1861) ICDs manufactured on or before April
16, 2002
* Contak Renewal (Model H135) and Contak Renewal 2 (Model H155) CRT-Ds
manufactured on or before August 26, 2004
* Ventak Prizm AVT, Vitality AVT, Renewal 3 AVT, and Renewal 4 AVT ICDs
(All series numbers).
Patients and doctors with questions can call the company at
1-866-GUIDANT.
Implant Infection Rate Higher
August 27, 2001 - Patients with ICDs who get staphylococcus aureus
bacteremia may have infected devices also. This risk is much higher than
anyone guessed before. Researchers now estimate that about 70% of S
aureus bacteremia patients who have an implanted device may also have a
device infection.
Dr. Anna Chamis studied 33 patients with ICDs or pacemakers who had S
aureus bacteremia over a 6 year period. Device infection was found in 15
of these patients (45%). “The majority of device infections showed no
obvious signs,” Dr. Chamis said.
In the 12 patients who had their device implanted within one year of
infection, 9 had confirmed device infections; So did 6 patients whose
device had been implanted for more than a year. Device infection was
suspected in another 9 patients, but these patients died of blood
poisoning before tests were completed.
Heart device infection is not always obvious, especially when the
infection involves the “pocket” where the device generator is implanted.
Sixty percent of the patients with confirmed device infection showed no
“detectable signs of generator pocket infection,” the researchers said.
Neither physical exam nor an echo can definitely spot this type of
infection.
In patients who get S aureus bacteremia, the device is usually involved,
and 40% of these patients do show signs of infection. However, in
patients who get S aureus bacteremia more than a year after device
implant, the device is not usually the source of bacteremia, and there
are no signs of device infection - even if the device is infected. The
implanted device is involved in about 28% of these patients.
Doctors with patients who get S. aureus bacteremia should worry about
device infection, Dr. Chamis said. Device infection results in increased
illness and death. If the infected device is not replaced, there is
increased risk of death.
If the device becomes infected, it should be replaced, Dr. Chamis said.
“If the device is not infected, then the patient should get extended
treatment with antibiotics. If test results are uncertain, patients
should be closely followed with repeated blood testing.”
Title: Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Patients With Permanent
Pacemakers or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
Authors: Anna Chamis, Gail Peterson, Christopher Cabell, G. Corey,
Robert Sorrentino, Ruth Greenfield, Thomas Ryan, L. Reller, Vance Fowler
Jr
Source: Circulation 2001;104:1029-1033
Correspondence to Vance G. Fowler, Jr, Box 3281, Division of Infectious
Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail
fowle003@mc.duke.edu
Device Implant Infections Way Up
May 26, 2006 - Risk of infection from device implants has risen much
faster than the number of implants in the past 8 years. The risk grew
faster for both ICDs and pacemakers. Researchers studied a database of
device-related infections. Their study shows that getting an infection
from device implant - whether in the device location or myocarditis -
increased risk of death 300%.
Most device implant infections happen in the “pocket” where the device
actually goes while almost one in five occur as myocarditis. This study
used numbers from 1996 to 2003 in the National Hospital Discharge
Survey. In 1996 roughly 160,000 devices were implanted and there were
about 4000 infections. By 2003, there were roughly 238,000 implants with
nearly 13,000 infections. Hospitalizations for device-related infections
rose about twice as fast as number of devices implanted. For unknown
reasons, being older or female, or both, lowered risk of infection from
implant.
Infections are usually “staph” of one sort or another. Many possible
reasons for the higher risk of infection were given but none are
certain. What is certain is that device implant, and generator/lead
replacements carry a risk of infection and this kind of infection raises
risk of death. Something to keep in mind.
Source: Heart Rhythm Society 2006 Scientific Sessions
Presenter: Dr Andrew Voigt
MADIT - ICD Versus Drug Treatment
December 1, 1995 - We studied the effect of different treatments on
ventricular arrhythmias. Fifty-nine people had an ICD, 53 took
anti-arrhythmic drugs and 179 got no arrhythmia treatment. We studied
mortality and type of death in these 291 consecutive patients evaluated
for heart transplant.
There were 109 deaths (37%) during a 15 month follow-up; 21% were sudden
death, 14% non-sudden death, and 2% were not heart-related. Sudden death
rate was lowest in the ICD group, intermediate in the no-treatment
group, and highest in the drug-treatment group. Anti-arrhythmic drug use
was linked to sudden death. ICDs were linked to non-sudden death (pump
failure).
Sudden death rates were lowest in ICD patients. Although ICDs reduced
sudden death in high-risk CHF patients, the effect on long-term survival
was limited, because these patients had high non-sudden death rates.
Title: Influence of the implantable cardioverter/defibrillator on sudden
death and total mortality in patients evaluated for cardiac
transplantation
Authors: Sweeney MO, Ruskin JN, Garan H, McGovern BA, Guy ML, Torchiana
DF, Vlahakes GJ, Newell JB, Semigran MJ, Dec GW
Source: Circulation 1995 Dec 1;92(11):3273-81
Comments in: Circulation 1996 Nov 1;94(9):2308-10 and Circulation 1997
Mar 18;95(6):1666 and Circulation 1997 Mar 18;95(6):1666-7
PMID: 7586314, UI: 96080082
ICDs Versus Amiodarone
November 27, 1997 - Patients who survive life-threatening ventricular
arrhythmias are at risk of it happening again. We compared 2 treatments:
ICD and anti-arrhythmic drugs. Patients had been resuscitated from
near-fatal ventricular fibrillation or had been cardioverted from
sustained ventricular tachycardia. Patients also had either fainting
spells or other serious cardiac symptoms, and an EF of 40% or less.
One group of patients had an ICD implanted and the other group got class
3 anti-arrhythmic drugs, usually amiodarone (Cordarone). Over the 4 year
period, 507 patients got an ICD and 509 took an anti-arrhythmic drug.
Forty-five percent had ventricular fibrillation and 55% had ventricular
tachycardia. The primary endpoint was overall mortality. Overall
survival was higher with ICD than with drug therapy.
ICDs versus Anti-arrhythmic drugs
Follow-up ICD survival Drug survival
one year 89% 82%
two years 82% 75%
three years 75% 64%
Authors; The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID)
Investigators
Source: N Engl J Med 1997 Nov 27;337(22):1576-83
Comments in: N Engl J Med 1997 Nov 27;337(22):1621-3 and ACP J Club 1998
May-Jun;128(3):60-1
PMID: 9411221, UI: 98026791
ICDs Versus Amiodarone - AMIOVERT
November 25, 2000 - NSVT (non-sustained ventricular tachycardia) is a
risk factor for sudden death in patients with DCM not caused by clogged
arteries. Figuring out which patients are at risk for SCD is tough. EP
studies usually don’t help much in this situation.
Trials such as CHF-STAT and GESICA suggest that amiodarone (Cordarone)
may reduce mortality in DCM patients. However, no study has compared
amiodarone to an ICD in these patients. The AMIOVERT study tested
whether an ICD was more effective than amiodarone for reducing mortality
in DCM patients with NSVT.
Patients were randomly assigned to either an ICD implant or 400mg
amiodarone twice a day for one week, followed by 400mg amiodarone once a
day for 51 weeks, then 300mg once a day. Liver function tests, thyroid
function tests, and chest x-rays were closely watched.
The study was stopped early because the endpoint was not going to be
reached. Patients not treated were enrolled in a registry.
Outcomes in both groups were similar. There were 72 patients in the
amiodarone group and 102 patients in the ICD group. Primary endpoint was
mortality at 2 years. Secondary endpoints included cause of death,
arrhythmia-free survival, cost, and quality of life. All patients had an
EF less than 36%, NSVT without symptoms, and class one to class 3 CHF.
There were 8 deaths in the amiodarone group and 13 in the ICD group.
Arrhythmia-free survival was better in amiodarone patients than in ICD
patients (arrhythmias are stopped with an ICD, not prevented). This
study did show that in DCM patients with a low EF and NSVT, overall
mortality at 4 years is the same whether the patient is treated with
amiodarone or an ICD.
Source: American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2000
Title: Amiodarone vs Implantable Defibrillator in Patients With
Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy and Asymptomatic Nonsustained Ventricular
Tachycardia
Author: Dr. S. Strickberger
Do ICDs Benefit CHFers?
October, 1998 - Do heart failure patients get benefit from an ICD? We
studied whether heart class was related to benefit from ICDs. We studied
data stored in the memory of ICD software.
Between 1989 and 1996, 603 patients used an ICD that “remembers” EKGs
taken by the ICD during an episode. Seventy-seven percent of these
patients were men, 59% had coronary artery disease and 16% had DCM.
Their average age was 57 years and their average EF was 44%.
We studied the link between heart class at ICD implant to overall
mortality and recurrence of arrhythmias. The benefit was defined as the
difference between mortality and the hypothetical death rate if the
device had not been implanted.
A significant difference between hypothetical death rate and overall
mortality was seen (14% at 1 year, 24% at 3 years, and 27% at 5 years).
This suggests a benefit from ICDs in people with heart failure.
Link between heart class and ICD benefit in CHFers
Follow-up Heart class at implant Benefit from ICD - Risk of death
lowered by:
class one one year 15%
class one 3 years 29%
class one 5 years 36%
class 2 to class 3 3 years 22%
class 2 to class 3 5 years 23%
Even class 3 patients with a history of decompensated heart failure
benefited from an ICD. Stored EKG data shows that in patients with a
history of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, an ICD
may prolong life in class 1, class 2, and class 3 patients. The benefit
is greatest in class 2 and class 3 patients at first but benefit may
last longest in class one patients.
Title: Potential benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
therapy in patients with and without heart failure
Authors: Bocker D; Bansch D; Heinecke A; Weber M; Brunn J; Hammel D;
Borggrefe M; Breithardt G;
Source: Circulation 1998 Oct 20;98(16):1636-43
PMID: 9778329 UI: 98451630
ICDs Are Safe Going Through Detectors
July 26, 1999 - People with ICDs can safely walk through electronic
anti-theft systems. The anti-theft machines use an electronic beam to
spot security-tagged merchandise being carried out of a store. Some
people worried that an ICD might interpret the electronic beam as a
rapid heartbeat, triggering a zap from the ICD.
Dr. Douglas Zipes, the study’s author says, “There is absolutely no
danger from a slow stroll through the gates, even if it takes 10
seconds.” In the study, one person even went through in a walker without
any problems. “A person should not lean on, or linger in between, theft
detection devices; but in normal use there is nothing to worry about,”
says Zipes.
“We tried to duplicate a normal situation of someone shopping and just
passing through the machines,” he says. In tests on 169 ICD wearers,
they found no problems from a normal 10 to 15 second walk through the
security gates. The researchers used a magnetic programmer tool to
prevent shocks during the tests. Although the devices continued to
record data so it was known whether a shock would have been delivered,
the shocking mechanism was turned off. “When an ICD fires, it is like a
mule kick in the chest. It’s not pleasant,” Zipes explains.
When the patients received a lot of exposure by standing within 6 inches
of the transmitter pole for 2 full minutes, 19 of the 169 people had ICD
interference. Seven of those episodes would have delivered shocks, Zipes
says.
This is in line with an FDA letter of 1998, which said that although the
anti-theft machines seemed safe, patients should not lean on or linger
in the machines. That same letter advised patients being scanned with
hand-held metal detectors like those used in airports, to warn security
personnel that they have an ICD and to ask them not to hold the metal
detector near the device any longer than necessary. (Jon’s note: Always
carry your ICD wallet card with you!)
Source: Circulation 1999;100:387-392
ICDs Best For Low EF Patients
October 4, 1999 - Survivors of life-threatening arrhythmia face a high
risk of another fatal episode, according to Dr. Michael Domanski, from
the AVID study. The report says that an ICD works better than
anti-arrhythmic drugs to improve survival of patients whose EF is less
than 35%.
Patients with an EF higher than 35% did no better with an ICD than with
drug treatment, but those with an EF below 35% had significantly better
survival with an ICD than with drug therapy. Patients with an EF below
20% however, had only a 2 to 3% survival advantage with an ICD versus
drug therapy.
Source: Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1999;34:1090-1095
Who Really Benefits From An ICD?
March 21, 2002 - ICDs prolong survival in patients with ischemic
cardiomyopathy and a positive EPS. The MADIT II trial tested whether
ICDs prolong survival in another patient group: those with prior heart
attack and ejection fractions under 30%, but who have not had an EPS.
1,232 such patients were randomized in a 3 to 2 ratio to either ICD or
standard drug therapy. Follow-up was 20 months. The mortality rate was
much lower in the ICD group (14.2%) than in the drug group (19.8%). No
ICD patients died. ICD patients did have more worsening heart failure
(19.9%) than drug-only patients (14.9%).
Notably, EPS was not used to identify high-risk patients. The results
suggest that ICDs should be considered for all patients with ischemic
cardiomyopathy. The precise reason for increased heart failure
hospitalizations in the ICD group and cost-effectiveness need further
study.
Title: Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with
myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction
Authors: Moss AJ, et al
Source: N Engl J Med 2002 Mar 21; 346:877-83 and
Title: Expanding indications for implantable cardiac defibrillators
Authors Bigger, JT
Source: N Engl J Med 2002 Mar 21; 346:931-3
Do Not Resuscitate & ICDs
April 17, 2000 - ICDs are becoming more common, and so are patients’ who
don’t want to be resuscitated when they die. Should doctors assume that
a patient with a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate order) wants his ICD
deactivated? Consider the case of a 66 year old man with DCM and serious
arrhythmia.
He was brought to the hospital with a massive stroke and congested
lungs. He was sent to the intensive care unit. One year before this, he
had suffered sudden cardiac death, and had an ICD implanted. The patient
did not improve. Permission to write a DNR order was obtained from the
patient’s family. Only after the family left the hospital did the
doctors realize that the patient was not to be resuscitated, but would
be automatically revived by the ICD if a lethal arrhythmia occurred. Did
the family’s consent to the DNR order mean the ICD should be
deactivated?
A patient’s DNR order is a refusal of CPR. In general, it is wrong to
assume that it includes anything else. In the case of an ICD however,
the treatment in question is electrical defibrillation, which is in the
same category as CPR.
The ICD was already in use when the DNR order was written. To understand
why this matters, let’s consider the ventilator. The patient was placed
on a ventilator for lung congestion. The family might reasonably expect
that since the patient was already on a ventilator when the DNR was
written, he would stay on the ventilator. Therefore the family might
reasonably expect that since the ICD was functioning when the DNR was
written, it would stay turned on.
Also, the ICD is an internal device and may be said to be part of the
patient. In this way, it is different from an external defibrillator, or
even the hands of a doctor performing CPR. The question is, “Has the ICD
become a part of the patient or is it just another form of CPR?” If the
ICD is just another form of CPR, it should be turned off and there is no
reason to tell the family. On the other hand, if the ICD is now part of
the patient, then the DNR order does not allow us to turn off the ICD.
Although the ICD is firmly imbedded inside the patient and its removal
would damage the patient (surgery would be required), the ICD does not
have to be removed to be deactivated. We believe the ICD falls into that
gray area between being a part of the patient - like a transplanted
organ - and being just another medical treatment. Thus, the patient
should decide. So consenting to a DNR does not authorize a doctor to
deactivate an ICD without a specific order to do so.
As implanted devices become more common, doctors will run into these
issues more often. Doctors must discuss these issues with their patients
who have implanted devices. Doctors must encourage those patients to
express their views in advance directives.
Title: Deactivating the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A
Biofixture Analysis
Author: Frederick Paola and Robert Walker
Source: South Med J 93(1): 20-23, 2000
Inducible Tachycardia A Danger Sign
June 30, 2000 - During an EPS, a doctor uses a catheter tool to make
your heart go into an irregular rhythm. If he succeeds, it means you are
at higher risk for having it happen at any time. If he cannot cause
(induce) an irregular rhythm, you may not be at high risk for an
arrhythmia episode.
Most sudden deaths result from ventricular tachycardia (VT) or
ventricular fibrillation (VF). Researchers in the USA and Canada studied
more than 1,700 patients. Of those patients, 353 had inducible VT and
1,397 did not. The patients were followed for over 3 years.
Inducible versus Non-inducible VT
Patient group Follow-up Risk of cardiac arrest/death All-cause mortality
with inducible VT 2 years 18% 28%
without inducible VT 2 years 12% 21%
with inducible VT 5 years 32% 48%
without inducible VT 5 years 24% 44%
Patients had coronary artery disease, an EF of 40% or less and
spontaneous, unsustained ventricular tachycardia. Results show that
“inducible” sustained VT identifies patients at much higher risk for
sudden death, the authors conclude. These patients may be candidates for
ICDs.
Source: N Engl J Med 2000;342:1937-1945
Online Network For ICD Wearers
January 2, 2002 - Medtronic has received FDA approval for their CareLink
Network. This system allows an ICD wearer to transmit his ICD data
straight from his device to a doctor over a regular phone line.
The ICD wearer has a wand that looks like a computer mouse connected by
a wire to a small console - this is called the monitor. You push a
button on the console, then wave the wand over your ICD. The wand
collects data from your implanted device and transfers it to the console
automatically through the wire. The console then automatically dials a
toll-free phone number and sends the data to the Network over a regular
phone line.
Doctors get their patients’ data by logging onto a doctors’ web site.
Patients can view their information on a personalized web site. At
first, only patients with GEM II DR/VR ICDs will be involved. However,
the network is designed to support many other devices, including
pacemakers. Existing implanted devices work with this system - no
changes or adjustments are needed.
Medtronic will sell patient monitors and software packages to doctors,
and will charge a fee for each use of the network. Patients may have to
pay a fee. Doctors may be able to bill patients’ insurance companies the
cost of a follow-up visit each time they access patient data. Ten pilot
sites will start the network.
The monitor is portable so it can be used when traveling as long as a
standard USA phone line is available. The network will also provide data
management for other health information. Medtronic is trying to protect
confidentiality and security by requiring registration and passwords to
access the web sites.
Jon’s notes - Will they really keep this info secure? I have no idea.
Big-name sites that depend on e-commerce to survive have not mastered
online security so I wonder how secure this venture can really be. I
would definitely not want my health care information online, especially
if I improve enough to go back to work. Once your medical history is out
in the open, there is no way to regain its confidentiality, ever,
period.
Billing insurers for online accesses to patient information opens up a
delightful source of fraud. Can Medtronic keep this under control? I
doubt it, but will wait and see. This is a truly wonderful idea that is
going to be very, very tough to keep legitimate and secure.
Sources: Reuters, AP, Medtronic’s press releases
Risk After MI Reduced By ICD
March 19, 2002 - Heart attack survivors with low EF can reduce their
risk of death by 31% with an ICD implant. The MADIT-II trial results
were presented at the American College of Cardiology 51st Scientific
Session. The study enrolled 1,232 patients who had suffered at least one
MI and had an EF of 30% or less.
742 patients had an ICD implanted plus got drug therapy, while the rest
were managed with drug therapy alone. During an average follow-up of 20
months, mortality in ICD patients was 14.2% compared to 19.8% for
non-ICD patients. That is a relative risk reduction of 31%. Mortality
from arrhythmia was 3.6% in ICD patients and 9.4% in the drug group.
Source: Reuters Health
ICD + Pacemaker Approved For CHF
July 5, 2002 - The FDA has approved Medtronic’s InSync ICD system. It
combines an ICD with a heart failure pacemaker (CRT therapy). The
implanted device synchronizes the heart beat and can slow a fast heart
rate, as well as deliver a shock to stop dangerous irregular beats.
A similar device by Guidant was approved in May. Medtronic’s device
supposedly uses fewer shocks to slow a rapidly beating heart.
Source: AP
Magnetic ICDs To Stop A-Fib
January 15, 1998 - In Control, Inc., announced today that Dr. Steven
Kutalek implanted a Metrix atrial defibrillator in a 42-year old man.
James Gamble suffered from a-fib, which is an irregular heart rhythm
that can lead to strokes. A-fib causes fatigue, shortness of breath, and
dizziness in many people. Drugs did not relieve his symptoms. Now when
Mr. Gamble feels a-fib, he can pass a magnet over his chest to trigger
the new device, which will return his heart to normal rhythm.
“A-fib episodes are not life threatening, but they can drive you nuts,
keeping patients from doing day-to-day activities,” explained Dr.
Kutalek, “The larger concern is that chronic a-fib can lead to stroke,”
he said. People with a-fib are about 5 times more likely to have a
stroke than healthy people.
Until now, treatment for a-fib was drugs, often used with external
cardioversion - an electric shock given with paddles like you see on tv
shows. The Metrix device can spot a-fib and deliver an electric shock to
restore normal rhythm, or the patient can trigger the unit himself by
passing a special magnet over his chest when he begins to feel symptoms.
Author: Sue Morgan
Source: Allegheny News
Atrioverter In Trials
1998 - This article is about an implanted device that converts a-fib to
normal rhythm with low-energy shocks. The trial included 51 patients.
The device was the InControl Metrix Atrioverter system. This is an
implanted device with 3 leads - right atrial and sinus leads, and a
ventricular pacing lead. After being implanted, the devices were set in
monitoring mode. A doctor delivered the shocks while the patient was
hospitalized during the trial.
Average follow-up was 259 days. A total of 3,719 shocks were delivered:
3,049 during testing and 670 for spontaneous a-fib episodes. The
detection software was 100% correct in recognizing normal rhythm and 92%
correct recognizing a-fib.
The device converted 96% of the episodes. Ten episodes could not be
converted. Early recurrence of a-fib was defined as the return of a-fib
within one minute after a shock that successfully converted rhythm to
normal. This happened in 51% of patients. The device was safe.
By the end of follow-up, all but 3 patients were on drug therapy, mostly
sotalol or amiodarone. Complications included vein blockage in 2
patients. Four patients required repositioning of a lead. Two patients
developed infection, requiring removal of the device and leads.
Conclusion: The atrioverter recognizes arrhythmias. It was effective in
converting a-fib, restoring 74% of episodes to normal rhythm by itself.
Overall effectiveness of the device was 86%. Early recurrence occurred
in 27% of shock episodes. This may be a problem outside the hospital
setting. The success of the device will ultimately lie in the ability of
patients to handle the shocks without sedation, especially if more than
one shock is required for success.
Title: Atrioverter: An Implantable Device for the Treatment of Atrial
Fibrillation
Authors: Wellens J, Lau CP, Luderitz B, Akhtar M, Waldo AL, Camm AJ,
Timmermans C, Tse HF, Jung W, Jordaens L, Ayers G
Source: Circulation 98:1651-1656, 1998
Sleep, Breathing, and ICDs
August 28, 2002 - Sleep-related breathing disorders may raise the risk
of arrhythmias in some people with ICDs. Dr. Joachim Fichter did a sleep
study of 38 patients. All had weak hearts with reduced ejection
fractions, averaging 36%. All also had life-threatening too-fast
ventricular arrhythmias and ICDS.
Sleep-related breathing disorders were diagnosed in 14 patients. Of
these, 8 showed Cheyne-Stokes respiration and the remaining 6 had
obstructive sleep apnea.
Monitoring showed that 4 of the Cheyne-Stokes patients and 4 of the
sleep apnea patients had ventricular arrhythmias during sleep. It was
also showed that arrhythmias during episodes of disordered breathing
were worse than during normal breathing.
Source: Chest 2002;122:558-561
The COMPANION Trial
March 31, 2003 - Implanting a combination ICD/CRT pacemaker in heart
failure patients on best drug therapy reduced all-cause mortality 43%,
according to the 1,634 patient COMPANION study. “We saw that 43%
reduction on top of best drug therapy. We are also getting fewer
hospitalizations,” said Dr. Michael Bristow, trial co-author.
Best drug therapy was defined as a beta-blocker, ACE inhibitor, and
Aldactone (spironolactone). Dr. Bristow thinks that when a cost analysis
is done, this will be cost-effective because it reduces
hospitalizations. Patients who got either a CRT pacemaker or a CRT
pacemaker with ICD “had 35% fewer hospitalizations for any cause and 39%
fewer hospitalizations for heart failure.” Of the patients enrolled in
the study, 55% “had ischemic heart disease and the effect was the same
in those patients,” Dr. Bristow said.
Dr. Jon Kobasigawa said, “This may be a quality of life issue. If the
device can reduce hospitalizations, it may significantly improve quality
of life for these patients.” Dr. Kobasigawa added that devices are
expensive, adding $20,000 or more to the cost of treatment.
Dr. Bert Pitt said he “didn’t think you can make the case for
cost-effectiveness when we can significantly reduce symptoms and risk of
death with drug therapy.” Dr. Pitt added that eplerenone treatment
“costs pennies compared to an ICD. I could throw pills at patients all
day and it still wouldn’t add up to the money spent on these devices.”
Dr. Bristow countered that Dr. Pitt’s trial studied “a different
population. Those were post-heart attack patients rather than chronic
advanced heart failure patients.” Dr. Bristow added that he isn’t
presenting a case for devices instead of drug therapy but added to heart
failure drugs.
Source: ACC 52nd Annual Scientific Sessions; Medscape
ICD Zap Survivors Need Monitoring
December 21, 2004 - Researchers analyzed data from the MADIT-II trial to
study long-term prognosis of patients who got life-saving zaps from
their ICDs. Of 720 patients with an ICD (average follow-up 21 months),
169 patients received 701 needed ICD zaps. Probability of surviving at
least one year after first ICD zap for either ventricular tachycardia
(VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was 80%.
Compared to those who did not get any zaps from their ICD, people who
were zapped were 3 times more likely to have heart failure episodes or
die from pump failure - worsening CHF. This study shows that successful
appropriate ICD shocks for VT or VF are associated with 80% survival one
year later. These patients are at increased risk for heart failure and
non-sudden cardiac death (pump failure) after successful ICD zaps.
Patients who get ICD shocks should receive special attention to prevent
and manage worsening left heart failure during long-term follow-up.
Title: Long-term clinical course of patients after termination of
ventricular tachyarrhythmia by an implanted defibrillator.
Authors: Moss AJ, Greenberg H, Case RB, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Brown MW,
Daubert JP, McNitt S, Andrews ML, Elkin AD. E-mail:
heartajm@heart.rochester.edu
Source: Circulation. 2004 Dec 21;110(25):3760-5. E-published 2004 Dec 6.
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)
The Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) is a device placed in
your body to help control your heart rhythm (the speed and pattern of
your heartbeat). This rhythm is set by signals from the heart’s
electrical system. A problem with these signals can cause your heart to
beat too quickly, too slowly, or irregularly. This is called an
arrhythmia.
Some symptoms of a fast heart rhythm may include:
* Palpitations (a fluttering, fast heartbeat) Dizziness or
Lightheadedness
* Fainting Spells
* Weakness
* Warm, Flushed Feeling
A heart rhythm problem can stop the heart from pumping blood. This is
called cardiac arrest and can be life threatening. (Note: Cardiac Arrest
is not the same as a heart attack. A heart attack is when a blood vessel
to the heart muscle is blocked.)
You may be given an ICD if you have had a cardiac arrest or if you have
a fast heart rhythm problem that could lead to cardiac arrest. The ICD
is not a cure for your heart rhythm problem. It can save your life by
quickly bringing a dangerously fast heart rhythm under control. You will
need an ICD for the rest of your life, so having one implanted means a
lifelong commitment.
Problems with electrical signals can cause very fast heart rhythms. Two
common types of heart rhythms are Ventricular Tachycardia (V-Tach) and
Ventricular Fibrillation (V-Fib). Both can lead to cardiac arrest, so an
ICD is usually needed.
With ventricular tachycardia, a ventricle contains a group of abnormal
electrical cells called a circuit. The circuit sometimes sends out
signals that make the lower chambers beat very fast. The chamber don’t
have time to fill with blood before the next beat. So, the heart pumps
less blood than the body needs, causing your symptoms. V-Tach can
progress to a more serious arrhythmia, V-Fib.
With ventricular fibrillation, abnormal circuits in the ventricles
sometimes send signals quickly and irregularly. The heartbeat can be so
fast and uneven that the heart muscle quivers rather than pumps. A
quivering heart is in cardiac arrest. Emergency treatment must be given
to get the heart pumping again, or death may result.
V-Tach and V-Fib usually develop in damaged heart muscle. This damage
may be caused by:
* A scar on the heart muscle from a heart attack
* Cardiomyopathy, which is a diseased, weakened heart muscle
* Other problems, including heart valve problems and congenital (present
at birth) heart problems
Sometimes a heart rhythm problem can exist even though the heart muscle
hasn’t been damaged. This is called a primary electrical problem. An
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) can help.
An ICD is a small, lightweight electronic device that is place inside
your body. It keeps track of your heart rhythm. When you have an
arrhythmia, the ICD helps your heart return to its normal rhythm. An ICD
can do one or more of the following:
* Antitachycardia pacing (ATP): The ICD can send out a series of pulses
to override a fast rhythm. This may feel like fluttering in your chest,
or may not be felt at all.
* Cardioversion: If ATP doesn’t slow a fast rhythm, the ICD can give the
heart one ore more small shocks. These break up the fast rhythm. They
may feel like thumps in your chest.
* Defibrillation: If the ICD senses a very fast, irregular rhythm, it
quickly sends a strong shock to the heart to override the fast rhythm.
You may feel this as a strong kick in your chest.
* Bradycardia Pacing: An ICD’s main job is to slow a fast heart rhythm.
At rare times, your heart may beat to slowly.This may happen if you have
a second heart rhythm problem that causes a slow heartbeat. Your heart
may also beat too slowly after an ICD shock. Most ICDs can send out
pulses to get a slow heartbeat back to the right speed.
Inserting the ICD into your body is called implantation. ICD
implantation is not open heart surgery. Rather, it’s a minor procedure
that’s done in an operating room or cardiac catheterization lab. You’ll
be given instructions on how to prepare for the procedure. The ICD can
be inserted near the right or left shoulder. If you prefer to have it
implanted on a particular side, discuss your preference with your
doctor.
Ask your doctor whether you should stop taking aspirin or other
medications before your procedure. Unless instructed otherwise, don’t
eat or drink anything for six hours before the procedure. Before the
procedure begins, you may be given some medication to help you relax.
This medication will help you “sleep” through part or all of the
procedure, so you won’t feel pain. The skin where the pacemaker is to be
implanted will be washed and shaved.
An incision is made in your skin below your collarbone. For an abdominal
implant, a second incision is also made below your ribcage. A small
“pocket” (space) is made under your skin or muscle for the ICD generator
to sit in. For the abdominal implant, the pocket is made near the
incision below the rib cage.
The lead for the ICD is threaded through the incision into a vein in
your upper chest. The lead is then guided into your heart’s chambers
using x-ray monitors. Electrical measurements are taken to determine a
good position for the lead in the heart. For an abdominal implant, the
other end of the lead is threaded under the skin from the chest to the
abdomen.
The ICD generator is attached to the lead. Then, the generator is placed
in the pocket under your skin. The ICD’s settings are programmed to
treat your heart rhythm problem. The incision is then closed and covered
with a sterile dressing.
(Note: A patch electrode is sometimes also used to help the ICD do its
job. If one is needed, your doctor will make another incision to place
the patch under the skin or muscle near your heart. A lead connects the
patch to the generator.)
In rare cases, the ICD may be implanted through open chest surgery. this
may be done along with open chest surgery for another heart problem, or
if problems keep the leads from being placed in the veins. The chest is
opened and the leads are attached to the outside of the heart. The
generator is placed in a pocket in the abdomen.
After your ICD is implanted, you’ll probably stay in the hospital for a
day or two. Before you go home, you will be told how to take care of
your incision site or sites as they heal. You may have some tests.
You’ll also have some follow-up visits scheduled.
During your stay in the hospital, your heart’s signals are monitored to
be sure the ICD is working right. A nurse may take your pulse and blood
pressure and check your incision for bleeding or swelling. Before you go
home, an x-ray of your chest may be taken. The ICD settings may also be
rechecked. This is done from outside your body. For a week or so, it’s
normal to have some pain and stiffness around your incision. Pain
medication can help make you more comfortable. Don’t raise the arm on
the side of the incision above your shoulder. This will give the lead a
chance to secure inside the vein and your heart. Be sure to tell your
nurse if you feel any unusual symptoms like hiccups that won’t go away,
dizziness, chest pain or shortness of breath.
At home, you can go back to most of your daily activities. But take it
easy for a month or so to avoid pulling the lead or leads out of place.
For a few weeks, you may feel numbness or fullness in the area around
the ICD. This is normal.
* Visit the doctor, usually in a week or so. During this visit, the
doctor may remove your sutures or staples, if you have them.
* Avoid raising the arm on the side of the ICD over your head. Your
doctor will tell you for how long - usually 2 to 6 weeks.
* Ask your doctor when you can return to activities like heavy lifting,
running, or contact sports.
Your incision should heal completely within about a month after the
implantation. You may feel and see a small bump under your skin where
the ICD is. This won’t be noticeable under your clothes. Even after you
heal, avoid playing with the ICD under your skin. If you take
medications for your heart problem, keep taking them as directed. Talk
to your doctor about driving. In some cases, driving may be restricted.
This would be due to your heart rhythm problem, not the ICD.
Call your doctor if you notice any of the following:
* Signs of an infection (a fever over 100 degrees F; redness, swelling
or warmth at the incision site; drainage from the incision)
* Twitching chest muscles
* Increasing pain around your ICD
* Bleeding from your incision
* Swollen arm on the side of the incision site
To be sure your ICD is working right, you’ll need to visit your doctor
or clinic several times a year. During these visits, the ICD’s record is
checked and the ICD’s settings can be changed, if necessary. The
settings can be changed from outside your body, without the need for
surgery. You may still feel symptoms when you have a fast heart rhythm,
but your ICD will stop them. If you do feel symptoms, follow your
doctor’s advice on what to do next. Tests such as an ECG may be
performed. Your ICD’s battery will also be checked. ICD batteries last 3
to 7 years. Your doctor will know well in advance when the battery needs
to be replaced. The battery won’t run down unexpectedly.
When you have an event, you may feel your usual symptoms of a fast heart
rhythm. If you do, find a place to sit or lie down. Put your feet up. If
possible have someone stay with you for about 15 minutes. You won’t
always feel the ICD working. Low-energy pulses may be enough to slow
your heart rhythm. If a shock is needed, though, you will feel it. It
may feel as light as a thump or as strong as a kick to the chest.
Whether you feel it working or not, you can rely on your ICD to treat
you when you need it. Very rarely, a person with an ICD may need
additional medical care. Know what to do if this happens.
If you have an event and feel okay afterward, let your doctor or nurse
know. (This is not an emergency, so call during business hours.)
When to Call 911 (Emergency)
* You still feel symptoms after a shock
* You feel 3 or more shocks in a row
* Your symptoms don’t away and you feel no shock
[Note: If you have a very fast, irregular heart rhythm, your blood
pressure will drop sharply and you may pass out. Your ICD will soon slow
the heart rhythm and you’ll wake up. A friend or family member should
call 911 (emergency) if you stay unconscious for more than 30 seconds.]
An ICD won’t keep you from living an active life. You can usually do
almost everything you did before you got your ICD, and since you will
probably feel better, you may do even more!
When you first get your ICD, you’ll be given an ID card to carry. This
ID card contains important information about your ICD. It also tells
others what to do in an emergency. Show it to any doctor, dentist, or
other medical professional you visit. Also, because pacemaker tend to
set off security devices like those found in airports and libraries, you
may need to show your card to security personnel. Hand-held security
wands (such as those in airports) may affect your ICD. Show your card to
avoid this type of scan. You should get an ID bracelet or necklace
saying you have a heart rhythm problem and an ICD. Ask your doctor or
nurse for your rate cutoff - the heart rate at which your ICD begins
treatment. Other healthcare providers may ask you for this number.
ICD’s are well protected from outside signals, so there are very few
things that can interfere with your pacemaker. But if you ever feel
symptoms that make you think a device is disrupting your ICD’s signals,
turn the device off or move away from it. Your symptoms should stop and
your ICD shouldn’t be damaged. To be safe, check with your doctor.
Appliances which should be safe to use include:
* Microwave ovens and other appliances in good repair
* Computers
* Hair Dryers
* Power Tools
* TV’s and Radios
* Stereos
* Electric Blankets and Heating Pads
* Vacuum Cleaners
There are a few things to avoid that might interfere with your ICD.
These include very strong magnets (like those used for an MRI or in
hand-held security wands), radio transmitting tours, ham radios, certain
surgical instruments and cellular phones. When using a cellular phone,
hold it on the ear farthest away from your pacemaker. Don’t carry it in
your breast pocket, even when it’s turned off. Also, a running car
engine generates an electrical field, so avoid leaning directly over the
open hood of a running car.
With an ICD, you’ll know that your heart rhythm problem can be managed.
Now you can live your life to the fullest. Talk to your doctor about
exercise and ask whether there are any activities you should avoid. Take
care of yourself and see your doctor regularly to ensure that you stay
healthy and feeling good!
Cathy Olig, RN, BS
Lead – Electrophysiology and Pacing
Why is the doctor performing this procedure?
Studies have shown that there are categories of patients with cardiac
disease that are at high risk for heart rhythms that are very fast and
can cause syncope (fainting) or threaten your life. In some cases, an
electrophysiologist may have done an electrophysiology study to
determine if you are at an increased risk to have these heart rhythms.
These rhythms are called ventricular tachycardia or ventricular
fibrillation.
Ventricular tachycardia is a fast heart rhythm that starts in the main
pumping chambers of the heart called the ventricles. In ventricular
tachycardia, the heart beats at such a rapid rate that the heart does
not have time to fill with the blood that is returning from the rest of
the body. In addition, because the rate is so fast, the heart cannot
effectively pump oxygenated blood back out to the head and major organs.
A patient in ventricular tachycardia may quickly lose consciousness as
the body is deprived of life-giving oxygen. A patient in ventricular
tachycardia may die without immediate treatment.
Ventricular fibrillation is disorganization of the contraction of the
heart muscle, making the heart unable to pump blood to the body.
Patients in ventricular fibrillation lose consciousness almost
immediately and may die if a normal heart rhythm is not quickly
restored.
What is an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)?
An ICD is a system with two main parts:
1) The pulse generator is a smooth, lightweight, metal case that
contains a battery and small computer. It continuously checks your
heart’s electrical signals. The memory in the pulse generator stores
information about your heart’s activity as well as the status of the ICD
battery.
2) The leads are insulated, flexible wires which are positioned in the
heart and are connected to the pulse generator.
There are several different ICDs. You may receive a one, two or three
lead system. Your electrophysiologist will discuss your treatment plan
with you prior to the procedure and review the lead system that will
best meet your needs.
When is an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) indicated?
Studies have shown that there are people who are at risk for extremely
fast heart rhythms. In general, patients with a heart muscle that has
been damaged and is not able to pump effectively are at higher risk for
rapid heart rhythms. The damage may be due to a heart attack, or some
other disease process. There are also rare genetic conditions that may
make a person at risk for life threatening rhythms.
Some patients have already been diagnosed with these fast rhythms and
have experienced a near death experience. Others may have an
Electrophysiology Study to determine if the patient is prone to
developing fast rhythms. Recent studies have shown that some cardiac
diseases increase the risk of developing fast rhythms. Your cardiologist
may recommend an ICD as prophylactic treatment in case you have a fast
rhythm.
An implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator is designed to continuously
monitor your heart rhythm. If a dangerously fast heart rhythm is
detected, the device will immediately treat the rhythm and deliver
therapy to return your heart to a normal rhythm. Treatment may include
either rapid pacing of your heart to break the rhythm, or a shock to
reset the heart’s electrical system.
In addition, most Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators contain
pacemakers. They may be programmed to pace your heart on a regular basis
or they may only provide pacing if your heart rate slows dramatically.
Your electrophysiologist will determine the best settings for your
clinical needs.
What happens during implantation of an Implantable Cardioverter
Defibrillator (ICD)?
Most ICDs are implanted in the Electrophysiology Lab using a local
anesthetic and medication to help you relax. Occasionally, a patient may
require general anesthesia if their medical condition warrants. The
decision regarding using anesthesia will be made by your
electrophysiologist. For uncomplicated implants, the patient generally
stays in the hospital overnight and goes home the day after the
procedure.
Patients will have an incision approximately 3 inches long just under
their collar bone (clavicle). The ICD will be placed under the tissue
above the pectoral muscle. You may possibly see the outline of the
device and may even feel it by pressing on your skin.
Implantation of an ICD takes from two to six hours depending on the lead
system selected and the anatomy of the patient.
On the day of the procedure, you will be asked not to ear to drink
anything after midnight.
If you have hair on your chest where the device will be placed, the
staff will clip the hair to help prevent infection. You will also
receive an antibiotic in your IV. The area where the physician will work
will be painted with a solution that kills bacteria.
You will receive medication in your IV to help you relax. Most patients
sleep through the procedure and have few memories of the surgery. During
the procedure, your heart rhythm, blood pressure and the oxygen in your
blood will all be continuously monitored.
You will be draped and your face will be covered for a short time. The
doctor will numb the area where the ICD will be implanted. You may feel
pressure in the area, but you should not feel pain. Please tell the
staff if you are having any pain. It is their goal to be sure you are
comfortable during the procedure.
After the incision, the physician will make a small opening under tissue
below your skin. This is called a “pocket” and the ICD pulse generator
will be placed in it. The physician will then use the subclavian vein,
which runs near the collarbone (clavicle) to place the leads in to your
heart. The leads are positioned in the appropriate chambers of the
heart. The ICD will then be connected to the leads and tested to make
sure it is properly functioning.
The incision will be closed and you will be allowed to wake up. Once
awake, you will be returned to your room and may eat and drink.
In some instances, the testing of the device will be done by bringing
you back to the lab some time after the procedure. If the test is done
at a later date, the electrophysiologist will test the device by using a
programmer to talk to your ICD. A small, specially designed wand will be
placed over the ICD to allow a computer to communicate with the device.
You will be asleep during the procedure and may not have a memory of it.
What should I do if I receive a shock?
If you receive one or two shocks, and are feeling fine, notify your
electrophysiologist or the Pacemaker/ICD clinic the next business day.
They will schedule a time for you to come in and will interrogate your
ICD to review what was happening in your heart to cause the device to
deliver therapy.
If you receive three or more shocks, you should call 9-1-1 and go to the
nearest emergency room. DO NOT DRIVE YOURSELF TO THE HOSPITAL.
Special Instructions for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs)
* MRI is contraindicated for patients with Implantable Cardioverter
Defibrillators. You may have a CT scan.
* Please carry your ICD identification card with you at all times.
* Wear a medic alert bracelet or necklace. If you are unconscious,
emergency health care professionals will know that you have an ICD that
treats life threatening heart rhythms.
* If you use a cellular phone, use the phone on the opposite ear from
the pulse generator. You should, also, not carry cell phones in a pocket
directly over your ICD. This only applies to cellular phones and not to
cordless phones you may have in your home.
* It is safe to walk through the theft detection devices at stores, but
you should not stand in or near them for more than a few seconds.
* The electrophysiologists at Meriter Hospital do not routinely
prescribe prophylactic antibiotic therapy for routine dental visits.
* If you have questions, please talk to your electrophysiologist.
Airport Safety
* You may walk through the metal detector at the airport without harm,
but do not stand in the metal detector for more than a few seconds.
* Carry your ICD identification card with you so that airport security
knows you have an ICD.
* Airport security may use the wand on you, but they should not hold it
over the area of the pulse generator (ICD) for more than a few seconds.
* Avoid standing near the metal detectors at the airport.
Do Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) wear out?
The ICD pulse generator runs on a battery and will eventually need
replacing. The length of time the battery lasts is dependant on several
factors:
* The type of device you received
* The amount of time the ICD is used to pace your heart
* The amount of energy that is needed to pace your heart
* How often you have received therapy for fast heart rhythms
The Pacemaker/ICD Clinic can estimate the amount of time left on the
battery when they check the ICD in the clinic. The device has protective
mechanisms built in to the programming to allow plenty of notification
that the battery needs replacing. The Pacemaker/ ICD Clinic will let you
know at your clinic visits that the battery is starting to get low, so
that you can plan when to have it replaced.
To change the battery on an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator, the
entire pulse generator has to be replaced. Most patients are discharged
from the hospital the same day as the procedure.
You will be brought to the Electrophysiology Lab and prepared as if you
were having a new implant. The cardiologist will numb the skin and make
an incision at the site of the pulse generator. The old generator will
be removed and the staff will assist the physician in checking the lead
system to be sure it is still working well. Then a new pulse generator
will be connected to the leads and placed back in the pocket. The
cardiologist may decide to test the device, just as it was tested at the
original implant. The suture line will be closed and you will be
returned to your room.
Because changing the battery does not usually require the placement of
new leads, the procedure is generally quicker. Typically the procedure
takes 2 hours or less.
What is an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ICD?
Some patients have very fast heart rhythms that may cause loss of
consciousness or even sudden death.
These serious rhythm disturbances may be treated with an implantable
cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).
ICD devices are larger than pacemakers but, like them, consist of wires
leading to the heart and a separate generator box implanted in a pocket
under the skin. When the ICD detects a serious heart rhythm problem, it
may deliver an electrical shock to the heart to restore normal rhythm.
Some ICD’s can function as a pacemaker as well.
Shocks delivered when someone is awake may be painful, but lifesaving. A
person touching you will not be shocked. Patients with an ICD should
discuss the safety of driving a car with their doctor.
Procedure Overview
What is a pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)
insertion?
A pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) insertion is a
procedure in which a pacemaker and/or an ICD is inserted to assist in
regulating problems with the heart rate (pacemaker) or heart rhythm
(ICD).
Pacemaker
When a problem develops with the heart’s rhythm, such as a slow rhythm,
a pacemaker may be selected for treatment. A pacemaker is a small
electronic device composed of three parts: a generator, one or more
leads, and an electrode on each lead. A pacemaker signals the heart to
beat when the heartbeat is too slow.
Illustration of a single-chamber pacemaker
Click Image to Enlarge
A generator is the “brain” of the pacemaker device. It is a small metal
case that contains electronic circuitry and a battery. The lead (or
leads) is an insulated wire that is connected to the generator on one
end, with the other end placed inside one of the heart’s chambers.
The electrode on the end of the lead touches the heart wall. In most
pacemakers, the lead senses the heart’s electrical activity. This
information is relayed to the generator by the lead.
If the heart’s rate is slower than the programmed limit, an electrical
impulse is sent through the lead to the electrode and the pacemaker’s
electrical impulse causes the heart to beat at a faster rate.
When the heart is beating at a rate faster than the programmed limit,
the pacemaker will monitor the heart rate, but will not pace. No
electrical impulses will be sent to the heart unless the heart’s natural
rate falls below the pacemaker’s low limit.
Pacemaker leads may be positioned in the atrium or ventricle or both,
depending on the condition requiring the pacemaker to be inserted. An
atrial dysrhythmia/arrhythmia (an abnormal heart rhythm caused by a
dysfunction of the sinus node or the development of another atrial
pacemaker within the heart tissue that takes over the function of the
sinus node) may be treated with an atrial pacemaker.
Illustration of a dual-chamber pacemaker
Click Image to Enlarge
A ventricular dysrhythmia/arrhythmia (an abnormal heart rhythm caused by
a dysfunction of the sinus node, an interruption in the conduction
pathways, or the development of another pacemaker within the heart
tissue that takes over the function of the sinus node) may be treated
with a ventricular pacemaker whose lead wire is located in the
ventricle.
It is possible to have both atrial and ventricular dysrhythmias, and
there are pacemakers that have lead wires positioned in both the atrium
and the ventricle. There may be one lead wire for each chamber, or one
lead wire may be capable of sensing and pacing both chambers.
A new type of pacemaker, called a biventricular pacemaker, is currently
used in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Sometimes in heart
failure, the two ventricles (lower heart chambers) do not pump together
in a normal manner. When this happens, less blood is pumped by the
heart.
A biventricular pacemaker paces both ventricles at the same time,
increasing the amount of blood pumped by the heart. This type of
treatment is called cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)
An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) looks very similar to a
pacemaker, except that it is slightly larger. It has a generator, one or
more leads, and an electrode for each lead. These components work very
much like a pacemaker. However, the ICD is designed to deliver an
electrical shock to the heart when the heart rate becomes dangerously
fast, or “fibrillates.”
An ICD senses when the heart is beating too fast and delivers an
electrical shock to convert the fast rhythm to a normal rhythm. Some
devices combine a pacemaker and ICD in one unit for persons who need
both functions.
The ICD has another type of treatment for certain fast rhythms called
anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP). When ATP is used, a fast pacing impulse
is sent to correct the rhythm. After the shock is delivered, a “back-up”
pacing mode is used if needed for a short while.
The procedure for inserting a pacemaker or an ICD is the same. The
procedure generally is performed in an electrophysiology (EP) lab or a
cardiac catheterization lab.
Other related procedures that may be used to assess the heart include
resting and exercise electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter monitor,
signal-averaged ECG, cardiac catheterization, chest x-ray, computed
tomography (CT scan) of the chest, echocardiography, electrophysiology
studies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the heart, myocardial
perfusion scans, radionuclide angiography, and ultrafast CT scan.
The heart’s electrical conduction system
Illustration of the anatomy of the heart, view of the electrical system
Click Image to Enlarge
The heart is, in the simplest terms, a pump made up of muscle tissue.
Like all pumps, the heart requires a source of energy in order to
function. The heart’s pumping energy comes from an indwelling electrical
conduction system.
An electrical stimulus is generated by the sinus node (also called the
sinoatrial node, or SA node), which is a small mass of specialized
tissue located in the right atrium (right upper chamber) of the heart.
The sinus node generates an electrical stimulus regularly at 60 to 100
times per minute under normal conditions. This electrical stimulus
travels down through the conduction pathways (similar to the way
electricity flows through power lines from the power plant to your
house) and causes the heart’s chambers to contract and pump out blood.
The right and left atria (the two upper chambers of the heart) are
stimulated first and contract a short period of time before the right
and left ventricles (the two lower chambers of the heart).
The electrical impulse travels from the sinus node to the
atrioventricular (AV) node, where it stops for a very short period, then
continues down the conduction pathways via the “bundle of His” into the
ventricles. The bundle of His divides into right and left pathways to
provide electrical stimulation to both ventricles.
What is an ECG?
This electrical activity of the heart is measured by an
electrocardiogram (ECG or EKG). By placing electrodes at specific
locations on the body (chest, arms, and legs), a tracing of the
electrical activity can be obtained. Changes in an ECG from the normal
tracing can indicate one or more of several heart-related conditions.
Dysrhythmias/arrhythmias (abnormal heart rhythms) are diagnosed by
methods such as EKG, Holter monitoring, signal-average EKG, or
electrophysiological studies. These symptoms may be treated with
medication or procedures such as a cardiac ablation (removal of a
location in the heart that is causing a dysrhythmia by freezing or
radiofrequency).
Reasons for the Procedure
A pacemaker may be inserted in order to provide stimulation for a faster
heart rate when the heart is beating too slowly, and when other
treatment methods, such as medication, have not improved the heart rate.
An ICD may be inserted in order to provide fast pacing (ATP),
cardioversion (small shock), or defibrillation (larger shock) when the
heart beats too fast.
Problems with the heart rhythm may cause difficulties because the heart
is unable to pump an adequate amount of blood to the body. If the heart
rate is too slow, the blood is pumped too slowly.
If the heart rate is too fast or too irregular, the heart chambers are
unable to fill up with enough blood to pump out with each beat. When the
body does not receive enough blood, symptoms such as fatigue, dizziness,
fainting, and/or chest pain may occur.
Some examples of rhythm problems for which a pacemaker or ICD might be
inserted include:
* atrial fibrillation - occurs when the atria beat irregularly and too
fast
* ventricular fibrillation - occurs when the ventricles beat irregularly
and too fast
* bradycardia - occurs when the heart beats too slow
* tachycardia - occurs when the heart beats too fast
* heart block - occurs when the electrical signal is delayed after
leaving the SA node; there are several types of heart blocks, and each
one has a distinctive ECG tracing
There may be other reasons for your physician to recommend a pacemaker
or ICD insertion.
Risks of the Procedure
Possible risks of pacemaker or ICD insertion include, but are not
limited to, the following:
* bleeding from the incision or catheter insertion site
* damage to the vessel at the catheter insertion site
* infection of the incision or catheter site
* pneumothorax - air becomes trapped in the pleural space causing the
lung to collapse
If you are pregnant or suspect that you may be pregnant, you should
notify your physician. If you are lactating, or breastfeeding, you
should notify your physician.
Patients who are allergic to or sensitive to medications or latex should
notify their physician.
For some patients, having to lie still on the procedure table for the
length of the procedure may cause some discomfort or pain.
There may be other risks depending upon your specific medical condition.
Be sure to discuss any concerns with your physician prior to the
procedure.
Before the Procedure
* Your physician will explain the procedure to you and offer you the
opportunity to ask any questions that you might have about the
procedure.
* You will be asked to sign a consent form that gives your permission to
do the test. Read the form carefully and ask questions if something is
not clear.
* You will need to fast for a certain period of time prior to the
procedure. Your physician will notify you how long to fast, usually
overnight.
* If you are pregnant or suspect that you are pregnant, you should
notify your physician.
* Notify your physician if you are sensitive to or are allergic to any
medications, iodine, latex, tape, or anesthetic agents (local and
general).
* Notify your physician of all medications (prescription and
over-the-counter) and herbal supplements that you are taking.
* Notify your physician if you have heart valve disease, as you may need
to receive an antibiotic prior to the procedure.
* Notify your physician if you have a history of bleeding disorders or
if you are taking any anticoagulant (blood-thinning) medications,
aspirin, or other medications that affect blood clotting. It may be
necessary for you to stop some of these medications prior to the
procedure.
* Your physician may request a blood test prior to the procedure to
determine how long it takes your blood to clot. Other blood tests may be
done as well.
* You may receive a sedative prior to the procedure to help you relax.
If a sedative is given, you will need someone to drive you home
afterwards.
* The upper chest may be shaved or clipped prior to the procedure.
* Based upon your medical condition, your physician may request other
specific preparation.
During the Procedure
Picture of a chest X-ray, showing a single-chamber implanted pacemaker
Chest X-ray with Implanted Pacemaker
A pacemaker or implanted cardioverter defibrillator may be performed on
an outpatient basis or as part of your stay in a hospital. Procedures
may vary depending on your condition and your physician’s practices.
Generally, a pacemaker or ICD insertion follows this process:
1. You will be asked to remove any jewelry or other objects that may
interfere with the procedure.
2. You will be asked to remove your clothing and will be given a gown to
wear.
3. You will be asked to empty your bladder prior to the procedure.
4. An intravenous (IV) line will be started in your hand or arm prior to
the procedure for injection of medication and to administer IV fluids,
if needed.
5. You will be placed in a supine (on your back) position on the
procedure table.
6. You will be connected to an electrocardiogram (ECG or EKG) monitor
that records the electrical activity of the heart and monitors the heart
during the procedure using small, adhesive electrodes. Your vital signs
(heart rate, blood pressure, breathing rate, and oxygenation level) will
be monitored during the procedure.
7. Large electrode pads will be placed on the front and back of the
chest.
8. You will receive a sedative medication in your IV before the
procedure to help you relax. However, you will likely remain awake
during the procedure.
9. The pacemaker or ICD insertion site will be cleansed with antiseptic
soap.
10. Sterile towels and a sheet will be placed around this area.
11. A local anesthetic will be injected into the skin at the insertion
site.
12. Once the anesthetic has taken effect, the physician will make a
small incision at the insertion site.
13. A sheath, or introducer, is inserted into a blood vessel, usually
under the collarbone. The sheath is a plastic tube through which the
pacer/ICD lead wire will be inserted into the blood vessel and advanced
into the heart.
14. It will be very important for you to remain still during the
procedure so that the catheter placement will not be disturbed and to
prevent damage to the insertion site.
15. The lead wire will be inserted through the introducer into the blood
vessel. The physician will advance the lead wire through the blood
vessel into the heart.
16. Once the lead wire is inside the heart, it will be tested to verify
proper location and that it works. There may be one, two, or three lead
wires inserted, depending on the type of device your physician has
chosen for your condition. Fluoroscopy, (a special type of x-ray that
will be displayed on a TV monitor), may be used to assist in testing the
location of the leads.
17. Once the lead wire has been tested, an incision will be made close
to the location of the catheter insertion (just under the collarbone).
You will receive local anesthetic medication before the incision is
made.
18. The pacemaker/ICD generator will be slipped under the skin through
the incision after the lead wire is attached to the generator.
Generally, the generator will be placed on the non-dominant side. (If
you are right-handed, the device will be placed in your upper left
chest. If you are left-handed, the device will be placed in your upper
right chest).
19. The ECG will be observed to ensure that the pacer is working
correctly.
20. The skin incision will be closed with sutures, adhesive strips, or a
special glue.
21. A sterile bandage/dressing will be applied.
After the Procedure
In the hospital
After the procedure, you may be taken to the recovery room for
observation or returned to your hospital room. A nurse will monitor your
vital signs for a specified period of time.
You should immediately inform your nurse if you feel any chest pain or
tightness, or any other pain at the incision site.
After the specified period of bed rest has been completed, you may get
out of bed. The nurse will assist you the first time you get up, and
will check your blood pressure while you are lying in bed, sitting, and
standing. You should move slowly when getting up from the bed to avoid
any dizziness from the period of bedrest.
You will be able to eat or drink once you are completely awake.
The insertion site may be sore or painful, but pain medication may be
administered if needed.
Your physician will visit with you in your room while you are
recovering. The physician will give you specific instructions and answer
any questions you may have.
Once your blood pressure, pulse, and breathing are stable and you are
alert, you will be taken to your hospital room or discharged home.
If the procedure is performed on an outpatient basis, you may be allowed
to leave after you have completed the recovery process. However, if
there are concerns or problems with your ECG, you may stay in the
hospital for an additional day (or longer) for monitoring of the ECG.
You should arrange to have someone drive you home from the hospital
following your procedure.
At home
You should be able to return to your daily routine within a few days.
Your physician will tell you if you will need to take more time in
returning to your normal activities. In addition, you should not do any
lifting or pulling on anything for a few weeks. You may be instructed
not to lift your arms above your head for a period of time.
You will most likely be able to resume your usual diet, unless your
physician instructs you differently.
It will be important to keep the insertion site clean and dry. Your
physician will give you specific bathing instructions.
Your physician will give you specific instructions about driving. If you
had an ICD, you will not be able to drive until your physician gives you
approval. Your physician will explain these limitations to you, if they
are applicable to your situation.
You will be given specific instructions about what to do if your ICD
discharges a shock. For example, you may be instructed to dial 911 or go
to the nearest emergency room in the event of a shock from the ICD.
Ask your physician when you will be able to return to work. The nature
of your occupation, your overall health status, and your progress will
determine how soon you may return to work.
Notify your physician to report any of the following:
* fever and/or chills
* increased pain, redness, swelling, or bleeding or other drainage from
the insertion site
* chest pain/pressure, nausea and/or vomiting, profuse sweating,
dizziness and/or fainting
* palpitations
Your physician may give you additional or alternate instructions after
the procedure, depending on your particular situation.
Pacemaker/ICD precautions
The following precautions should always be considered. Discuss the
following in detail with your physician, or call the company that made
your device:
* Always carry an ID card that states you are wearing a pacemaker or an
ICD. In addition, you should wear a medical identification bracelet that
states you have a pacemaker or ICD.
* Use caution when going through airport security detectors. Check with
your physician about the safety of going through such detectors with
your type of pacemaker. In particular, you may need to avoid being
screened by hand-held detector devices, as these devices may affect your
pacemaker.
* You may not have a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedure. You
should also avoid large magnetic fields.
* Abstain from diathermy (the use of heat in physical therapy to treat
muscles).
* Turn off large motors, such as cars or boats, when working on them
(they may temporarily “confuse” your device).
* Avoid certain high-voltage or radar machinery, such as radio or
television transmitters, electric arc welders, high-tension wires, radar
installations, or smelting furnaces.
* If you are having a surgical procedure performed by a surgeon or
dentist, tell your surgeon or dentist that you have a pacemaker or ICD,
so that electrocautery will not be used to control bleeding (the
electrocautery device can change the pacemaker settings).
* You may have to take antibiotic medication before any medically
invasive procedure to prevent infections that may affect the pacemaker.
* Always consult your physician if you have any questions concerning the
use of certain equipment near your pacemaker.
* When involved in a physical, recreational, or sporting activity, you
should avoid receiving a blow to the skin over the pacemaker or ICD. A
blow to the chest near the pacemaker or ICD can affect its functioning.
If you do receive a blow to that area, see your physician.
* Always consult your physician when you feel ill after an activity, or
when you have questions about beginning a new activity.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown in several
clinical trials to improve symptoms and exercise capacity in patients
with advanced heart failure. The first clinical trials of CRT-D devices
were based on populations who already met a standard indication for
implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. In these patients,
when CRT is contemplated, a CRT-D device is used. In a broad population
of patients with advanced heart failure, the choice of adding ICD
therapy is less clear.
Methods and results Results of several clinical trials of CRT and ICD
use in heart failure are reviewed. An analysis of data suggests that CRT
may reduce death due to progressive heart failure. Recently, the
COMPANION trial has reported that CRT can reduce long-term morbidity and
mortality. CRT can be delivered as a pacemaker only, or in combination
with an ICD. Taken alone, an ICD can improve survival in select groups
of patients with left ventricular dysfunction; however, adverse effects
have been seen, such as worsening heart failure.
Conclusion There are no clinical trials designed specifically to address
the relative merits of CRT delivered by pacemaker versus ICD. Based on
our knowledge of the effects of both, along with data from recent
clinical trials, it appears as though the preponderance of evidence is
in favor of CRT-D. More will be learned from clinical trials currently
underway
Key Words: Heart failure • Implantable cardioverter defibrillator •
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
Introduction
Heart failure is a common disease in developed countries. It is the most
common reason for hospitalization among those over the age of 65 years,
and both the incidence and prevalence of heart failure are anticipated
to increase as the population ages.1,2 Symptoms of heart failure can
become disabling, affecting simple activities of daily living. Despite
advances in the treatment of heart failure, many patients remain very
symptomatic, and both morbidity and mortality remain high, creating a
need for improved therapies.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a recent addition to therapy
for symptomatic heart failure.3 CRT has consistently been shown to
improve symptoms and exercise capacity in several randomized clinical
trials.4–8 Recently, the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and
Defibrillation (COMPANION) trial has demonstrated a substantial
reduction in the combined endpoint of mortality and all-cause
hospitalization, thereby expanding the importance of CRT in the
treatment of heart failure.9
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown to reduce
mortality in patients at high risk for arrhythmia.10–12 Initially,
attention was focused on patients with markers for ventricular
arrhythmia, such as nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or inducible
sustained ventricular tachycardia during an electrophysiology
study.10,12 More recently, attention has been drawn to left ventricular
systolic dysfunction as a sole risk factor for arrhythmic death.11
CRT is delivered with devices that are either pacemakers alone, or are
combined with ICD therapy (CRT-D). The first clinical trials of CRT-D
devices were based on populations who already met a standard indication
for ICD therapy. Clearly, in such patients, when CRT is contemplated, a
CRT-D device is used. In a broad population of patients with advanced
heart failure, the choice of device is less clear. Should we implant CRT
devices alone, or add ICD therapy?
In this review, the risks and benefits of CRT devices and ICD therapy
alone in heart failure patients will be summarized. The risks of CRT-D
devices will be reviewed, along with the benefits observed in randomized
clinical trials.
CRT
Conduction system disease is common in patients with advanced heart
failure and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, estimated to
occur in 25% of patients with advanced symptoms of heart failure and low
ejection fraction.13 Such conduction abnormalities may cause an
inefficient left ventricular contraction, uneven LV wall stress,
increased myocardial oxygen consumption, and increased mitral
regurgitation.14,15 In studies of heart failure patients, conduction
system disease is associated with increased symptoms and a poor
prognosis. CRT has the potential to normalize these abnormalities,
thereby improving patient outcome.
The benefits and risks of CRT
Table 1 displays the results of CRT on symptoms, quality of life and
exercise capacity in clinical trials. Although the trials used different
devices and differed somewhat in methodology, CRT consistently
demonstrated a benefit in all these parameters.4–8 Furthermore, the
magnitude of benefit is large. In studies of pharmacologic treatment of
heart failure, drug therapy known to have long-term benefits is often
associated with less improvement or no measurable improvement in some of
these metrics.16–18
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1 Effects of CRT on symptoms and exercise capacity in clinical
trials
The long-term effect of CRT on morbidity and mortality was not
elucidated by these studies. In the Multicenter InSync Randomized
Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE) trial, the investigators reported that CRT
reduced the composite secondary endpoint of death or heart failure
hospitalization (8% CRT, 15% control, ).4 Although the findings were
very reassuring, the composite endpoint was fairly narrow and the
follow-up was limited, leaving doubt about the long-term effects of CRT.
In order to provide more insight into the effects of CRT on mortality,
Bradley et al.19 performed a meta-analysis of survival using data from
the four of the trials listed in Table 1. Although they were unable to
demonstrate an overall mortality benefit (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.51–1.18),
the trend was reassuring and a reduction in death due to progressive
heart failure became apparent (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25–0.93). The methods
used in these trials were to randomize patients after a functioning CRT
device was successfully implanted, thus negating any potential adverse
effects of the implant in the data analysis.
This series of studies of CRT brought this new therapy to clinical
practice by providing consistent evidence of substantial improvement in
symptoms, exercise capacity and quality of life. The data on morbidity
and mortality were clearly trending in the right direction, but were not
certain. The risks of CRT implants appear to be relatively low, but
certainly deserve attention. The adverse event rates for the Multisite
Stimulation in Cardiomyopathies Trial (MUSTIC), MIRACLE, MIRACLE-ICD and
CONTAK CD clinical trials are shown in Table 2.4,6–8 Deaths around the
time of implant are uncommon, but do occur. The most common adverse
events were related to lead dislodgement, followed by coronary sinus
trauma.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2 Complications of implantation of CRT devices
The risks and benefits of ICD therapy in a heart failure population
As mentioned, the study of prophylactic ICD therapy has evolved from
evaluating those with markers for ventricular arrhythmias, to evaluating
those with severe LV systolic dysfunction and finally those with
symptomatic heart failure.10–12,20
The first trial to demonstrate a benefit of prophylactic ICDs in
patients with LV dysfunction was the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator
Implantation Trial (MADIT).10 In this study, patients with a history of
myocardial infarction, low LVEF (<40%) and nonsustained ventricular
tachycardia were screened. If eligible, they underwent electrophysiology
(EP) study to determine whether they were inducible for sustained
ventricular tachycardia (VT). They were then tested to determine whether
procainamide could suppress the arrhythmia, and only if procainamide
failed to suppress VT were they enrolled in the study. Patients were
randomized to an ICD or no ICD. Medical therapy was prescribed at the
investigators' discretion.
A total of 196 patients were enrolled in the study. Mortality, the
primary endpoint, was substantially lower for the ICD group, a 54%
relative risk reduction at a median follow-up of 27 months. Two issues
confounded the study. First, there was only a modest use of drugs known
to be beneficial for patients with LV dysfunction, with 50–60% of the
cohort being treated with an ACE inhibitor. Furthermore, there was a
disparity in the use of ß-blockers, with 31% of patients in the ICD
receiving the beneficial effects of ß-blockers compared with only 14% in
the control arm at last contact. Although the magnitude of benefit was
impressive, the overall small numbers and disparity in medical therapy
between the groups left the community of physicians treating heart
failure somewhat skeptical.
The Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT) study was a trial
to study the approach of electrophysiologically guided therapy versus no
antiarrhythmic therapy for a population at high risk for mortality from
sudden death.12 Patients included had a history of a myocardial
infarction, a low ejection fraction (<40%) and documentation of
nonsustained VT. For the EP guided therapy group, the protocol
stipulated a series of therapeutic trials, with the possibility of an
ICD as an option if drugs failed to suppress the VT. As the trial
progressed and more experience was gained with nonthoracotomy ICD
implants, the ICD was used more frequently. The results demonstrated a
modest benefit of EP guided therapy for the primary endpoint of cardiac
arrest or death from arrhythmia. When the EP guided therapy group was
divided into those treated with ICDs and those treated with
antiarrhythmic drug therapy, it became apparent that all of the benefit
rested with the patients treated with an ICD. If one evaluates those who
happened to have received an ICD compared with those in the control
group, the result was a 60% reduction in mortality with the ICD (RR
0.40, 95% CI 0.27–0.59). Unfortunately, the primary hypothesis of the
trial did not involve an ICD and the patients who received an ICD were
not randomized to that therapy, but were selected by their treating
physicians, leaving the potential for bias. Accordingly, the results of
the trial were left open to other interpretations.
As a result of impressive apparent benefits of prophylactic ICD therapy,
the authors of the ACC/AHA guidelines for pacemaker and ICD implant
endorsed the use of the prophylactic ICD for patients who would meet
either the MADIT or MUSTT criteria.1,2 The authors of the ACC/AHA heart
failure guidelines, while acknowledging these studies and recommending
physician discretion in the use of these indications, did not strongly
endorse these methods and actually recommended against screening for
asymptomatic arrhythmia that would identify patients would meet the
MADIT or MUSTT criteria. The authors of the ESC guidelines for the
treatment of chronic heart failure reviewed some of the above studies,
but noted that a broad heart failure population has not been studied.
The MADIT II study represented a departure from prior studies for
patient selection. Instead of using markers of arrhythmia for entry,
such as nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or the results of EP
studies, the major risk criteria were a history of myocardial infarction
and a very low ejection fraction (<=30%).11 In this respect, the MADIT
II study becomes a study of left ventricular systolic dysfunction,
rather than ventricular arrhythmia. This study was a prospective,
randomized, controlled clinical trial that was not confounded by
imbalances in medical therapy or issues with treatment assignment. The
study demonstrated an impressive 31% reduction in all-cause mortality at
a median follow-up of 20 months. Two issues raised concerns. First, it
took more than one year to begin to see a mortality benefit with the
ICD. Second, there was an increase in heart failure hospitalization in
the ICD group, with an absolute difference of 5.0% (similar to the
mortality benefit of 5.6%), and a rate of 9.4 vs. 11.3 hospitalizations
per patient month () for the control and ICD arms, respectively. The
study may have been confounded by right ventricular pacing which appears
to have the potential for causing worsening heart failure.21,22 In the
MADIT II study, neither the choice of specific device, nor the pacing
mode were mandated by protocol, but were left to the investigators'
discretion.
When taking these studies together, there is a consistent survival
benefit seen with ICDs in patients with LV dysfunction. Concern has been
raised about the possibility of adverse effects of ICDs causing
unforeseen problems such as worsening heart failure, and there is no
proposed mechanism or clinical observation that suggest that ICDs can
improve the heart failure condition.
Finally, the Sudden Cardiac Death Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) was
recently reported.24 This, trial was designed to assess the potential of
either an ICD or amiodarone to reduce the risk of sudden death in a
broad population of heart failure patients (NYHA Class II and III) with
low ejection fraction. The trial demonstrated no effect with amiodarone,
but a 23% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality with an ICD (HR
0.77, 97.5% CI 0.62–0.96, ). This was the first clear demonstration of a
benefit of ICD therapy in a broad heart failure population, and will
clearly increase the use of ICDs in this group. However, there was a
difference in the benefit seen in Class II and Class III heart failure.
Patients with Class II heart failure had a dramatic benefit (HR 0.54,
97.5% CI 0.40–0.74), whereas those with Class III heart failure had no
clear benefit (HR 1.16, 97.5% CI 0.84–1.61). Caution should be used in
interpretation of this subgroup finding and more information will be
forthcoming regarding potential reasons for this observation. This
finding, in combination with the finding of worsening heart failure in
|